whatbindsCheck your order

Clauses · FAR · Administration and definitions

FAR 52.222-1 Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes

Does the regulation require it to flow down?

No

The current text on acquisition.gov shows only the notification paragraph, with no flow-down (verified in two readings); the classic FEB 1997 version had a (b) requiring insertion of the substance in subcontracts whose disputes could delay the contract — same date, divergent text, removal unexplained (unconfirmed). Primes include it in every PO anyway

A clause can reach your subcontract without a mandate. Once it is in your document, it is a contract term all the same. The missing mandate is a fact about the regulation. It is not a ruling on your order.

Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-04 · edition FEB 1997 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗

What it makes you produce

One item for your checklist.

  1. Something you write

    Days to weeks, and nobody outside your company has to agree to it.

    • Immediate written notice of a labor dispute, actual or potential, that delays or threatens to delay the work, with the relevant information

      FAR 52.222-1

When it is used

Prescription 22.103-5(a), no dollar threshold — appears in practically any contract where a labor dispute could delay delivery. At the sub level, it arrives via the prime's template.

Read closely

The text on the current page is a single sentence with no paragraphs, so the citation stays at the clause. It asks for the notice, not for preventing the dispute, and the whole cost is one email on the day.

The 10 templates that name it, with the line

Source: acquisition.gov, FAR 52.222-1 and 22.103-5(a) (verified 2026-08-04)

This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.