Clauses · DFARS · Cybersecurity
DFARS 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
Yes
When the sub's performance involves covered defense information or operationally critical support — including commercial subs
- Form
- verbatim (without alteration)
- Reaches
- all tiers
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-09 · edition MAY 2024 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
7 items for your checklist, slowest first.
A program you have to be running
You are either running it or you are not, and what the prime asks for is the date it started.
- 252.204-7012(b)(2)(i)
The NIST SP 800-171 security requirements, in the version in effect when the solicitation was issued, running on every system of yours that holds or moves the covered information
Owed when the system is your own — (b)(1) sends an information technology service operated on the Government's behalf to the contract's own terms instead
Something somebody else has to issue you2
The same day if the issuer is one of your own suppliers, months if it is an assessor or an underwriter.
- 252.204-7012(c)(3)
A DoD-approved medium assurance certificate, bought from an outside certificate authority
Owed when an incident has to be reported — the certificate is what the reporting channel authenticates against, so it is held before the incident rather than obtained after it
- 252.204-7012(b)(2)(ii)(D)
A cloud service provider meeting security requirements equivalent to the FedRAMP Moderate baseline, and complying with (c) through (g) on reporting and forensics
Owed when covered information sits on a cloud service you did not build — the paragraph reaches an external provider only
Something you write3
Days to weeks, and nobody outside your company has to agree to it.
- 252.204-7012(b)(2)(i)
A system security plan for each of those systems, and a plan of action for the requirements not yet in place
Owed when the same systems (b)(2)(i) reaches — the plan and the plans of action are named by NIST SP 800-171 itself rather than by the clause's own words
- 252.204-7012(b)(2)(ii)(B)
A written request to vary from a security requirement, for a DoD Chief Information Officer representative to adjudicate
Owed when a NIST SP 800-171 requirement is not implemented and you are asking to vary from it
- 252.204-7012(b)(2)(ii)(C)
A copy of an approval you already hold, provided when you ask for that earlier adjudication to be recognized on this order
Owed when a DoD Chief Information Officer representative has already ruled that a requirement is not applicable to you, or that an alternative measure is equally effective
Something you fill in and send back
Hours, once you know which one is missing.
- 252.204-7012(c)(1)(ii)
A cyber incident report filed at dibnet.dod.mil within 72 hours of discovering the incident
Owed when an incident affecting a covered system, the covered information on it, or your ability to perform the order is discovered
When it is used
All DoD contracts, including commercial, except exclusively COTS acquisitions. No dollar threshold.
Read closely
Two duties here are running costs rather than deliverables: malicious software goes to the DoD Cyber Crime Center ((d)), and images of affected systems and the relevant monitoring data are held at least 90 days from the report ((e)). The edition in force points at revision 2 of NIST SP 800-171 and its 110 requirements; documents written against the October 2016 edition pin revision 1, so the count depends on which edition the order names.
The 23 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, DFARS 252.204-7012, codified text read at DFARS Change 5/7/2026, prescribed at 204.7304(c) with designation (MAY 2024); RFO class deviation 2026-O0025 (DFARS part 240, effective 2026-02-01) prints the same designation but prescribes it at 240.370-5(c), so the clause is unchanged and the prescription has moved into the new part 240 (verified 2026-08-09)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.