Clauses · DFARS · Supply chain and sourcing
DFARS 252.225-7009 Restriction on Acquisition of Certain Articles Containing Specialty Metals
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
Yes
Subs (including commercial) for items containing specialty metals; exceptions: electronics, COTS (with caveats), 2% de minimis content
- Form
- paragraphs (a)–(c) + (e)(2)
- Reaches
- all tiers
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-09 · edition JAN 2023 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
One item for your checklist.
Something somebody else has to issue you
The same day if the issuer is one of your own suppliers, months if it is an assessor or an underwriter.
Mill certificates giving the country of melt for every specialty metal incorporated in the item, gathered back through the bill of material — evidence the prime weighs, not paper the clause names
DFARS 252.225-7009
When it is used
225.7003-5(a)(1) prescribes the clause for acquisitions that (i) exceed the SAT ($350k) AND (ii) require delivery of aircraft, missile or space systems, ships, tank or automotive items, weapon systems or ammunition — or components of those items — IF the items or components contain specialty metal. Definition: alloy steels, nickel/iron-nickel/cobalt base alloys, titanium, zirconium — pure tungsten and molybdenum are NOT specialty metals. (Trigger corrected 2026-08-05, backlog item 12: the entry read the two legs as a disjunction, and the prescription verbatim is 'Require delivery of any of the following items ... IF such items or components contain specialty metal' — a conjunction. The category leg was also encoded as `workType == metal-manufacturing`, which made the engine rule the clause OUT for any other workType; the six categories are a fact about the deliverable and the profile has no field that carries them, so both legs are structural now. Verified against acquisition.gov, DFARS 225.7003-5.)
Read closely
(b) is the restriction and (c) carries six exceptions — electronic components, certain off-the-shelf items, commercial fasteners, qualifying-country items, a nonavailability determination, and noncompliant metal at or under 2 percent of the end item by weight. (d) is the alternative route for a commercial derivative military article, and (e)(1) directs the prime to reserve (d) and (e)(1) itself when flowing the clause down — so an order reading 'applies in its entirety, less paragraph (d)' has done what (e)(1) says, and the alternative route stays at the prime's level.
The 19 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, DFARS 252.225-7009, codified text read at DFARS Change 5/7/2026, prescribed at 225.7003-5(a)(2) with designation (JAN 2023); RFO class deviation 2026-O0041 (DFARS part 225, effective 2026-02-17) prints the same prescription and the same designation, so the two regimes agree (verified 2026-08-09)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.