Clauses · FAR · Ethics and integrity
FAR 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
Yes
All subcontracts > $200,000
- Form
- substance, except (c)(1)
- Reaches
- cascades above the threshold
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-09 · edition Jun 2020 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
2 items for your checklist, slowest first.
A program you have to be running
You are either running it or you are not, and what the prime asks for is the date it started.
Reasonable procedures in place and in use to prevent and detect kickbacks in your own operations and in your direct business relationships
FAR 52.203-7(c)(1)
Something you write
Days to weeks, and nobody outside your company has to agree to it.
- FAR 52.203-7(c)(2)
A written report to the agency Inspector General, or to the Attorney General where the agency has none
Owed promptly on reasonable grounds to believe a kickback described in (b) may have occurred
When it is used
Contracts > $200,000 (was $150k until 2025-09-30); not used in commercial acquisitions (the statute applies regardless).
Read closely
(c)(5) is the paragraph that decides which of these two travels: the substance carried into lower-tier subcontracts is the clause excepting (c)(1), so the procedures duty attaches where the whole clause was written in and not where only its substance was. (c)(3) is full cooperation with a federal investigation, and (c)(4) lets the contracting officer offset a kickback against money owed, or direct the prime to withhold it from a supplier.
The 16 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, FAR 52.203-7, codified text read at FAC 2026-01 (effective 2026-03-13), prescribed at 3.502-3 with designation (Jun 2020), and carried over verbatim in the RFO Part 52 disposition table (verified 2026-08-09)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.