Clauses · FAR · Administration and definitions
FAR 52.244-5 Competition in Subcontracting
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
No
Primes mirror it in larger subs to extend the competition discipline down the chain and defend themselves in a purchasing system review (CPSR) — the clause itself only governs how the contractor selects its own suppliers
A clause can reach your subcontract without a mandate. Once it is in your document, it is a contract term all the same. The missing mandate is a fact about the regulation. It is not a ruling on your order.
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-04 · edition AUG 2024 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
One item for your checklist.
Nothing to send, ever
There is no paperwork here. It is a rule you follow while you perform the work.
Nothing to hand over. Suppliers and lower tiers are selected on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract
FAR 52.244-5(a)
When it is used
Negotiated contracts above the SAT ($350k), except FFP awarded with adequate price competition or price set by law, and except T&M, labor-hour, and architect-engineer (44.204(c)). No regulatory flow-down — it becomes the sub's business when the prime mirrors it and the sub has significant purchasing/lower-tier work.
Read closely
(b) is the one express exception: an approved Department of Defense mentor may place work with its protege without competition. The paragraph states how selection is done and requires no record of its own — the documentation a purchasing system review asks for comes from that review's criteria rather than from this clause.
The 8 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, FAR 52.244-5 and 44.204(c) (verified 2026-08-04)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.