Clauses · DFARS · Quality and inspection
DFARS 252.246-7003 Notification of Potential Safety Issues
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
Yes
(f)(1): subcontracts for (i) parts identified as critical safety items, (ii) systems and subsystems, assemblies, and subassemblies integral to a system, or (iii) repair, maintenance, logistics support, or overhaul services for those items, with no dollar threshold. (f)(2) reaches those same subcontracts, 'including subcontracts for commercial products or commercial services'
- Form
- substance — (f)(1): 'the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (f)'
- Reaches
- all tiers — (f)(2) has the sub notify the prime/higher-tier AND directly the ACO and the PCO if it knows who they are
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-11 · edition JAN 2023 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
2 items for your checklist, slowest first.
Something you write2
Days to weeks, and nobody outside your company has to agree to it.
- DFARS 252.246-7003(c)(1)
Notice to both the administrative and the procuring contracting officer, as soon as practicable and inside 72 hours — the fastest clock in this clause
Owed on discovering or acquiring credible information of a nonconformance in a critical safety item, or of one that may have a safety impact on a system or something integral to one
- DFARS 252.246-7003(c)(2)
A written notification to both officers within 5 working days — the defect, a chronology, the items affected and a point of contact
Owed on the same credible information, 5 working days behind the 72-hour call
When it is used
Applies in contracts for: (i) repairable or consumable parts identified as critical safety items; (ii) systems, subsystems, assemblies, and subassemblies integral to a system; (iii) repair, maintenance, logistics support, or overhaul services for those items (prescription 246.370). No dollar threshold. The obligation triggers when 'credible information' arises of a nonconformance or deficiency with possible safety impact — death, permanent total or partial disability, hospitalization, loss of a weapon system, or property damage above $1,000,000.
Read closely
(b) sets the two triggers the notices run on. (e) says the notification is neither an admission of responsibility nor a release of liability, which is what makes the 72-hour call safe to make; (d) puts the same duty on you for an item furnished by your own supplier.
The 18 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, DFARS 252.246-7003. CODIFIED REGIME, read 2026-08-11 on the part-252 page at DFARS Change 5/7/2026: "As prescribed in 246.370(a), use the following clause:" with designation (JAN 2023). DEVIATION REGIME, read 2026-08-11 in acquisition.gov/sites/default/files/page_file_uploads/DoD_RFO_Deviation_Part-46.pdf (569581 bytes, 42 pages, DARS Tracking Number 2026-O0035, "Effective February 1, 2026, contracting officers shall use"): 246.370(a) reads "Insert the clause at 252.246-7003, Notification of Potential Safety Issues, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for the acquisition of—", and the clause head reads "As prescribed in 246.370(a), use the following clause:" with the same designation (JAN 2023). THE TWO REGIMES AGREE on number, prescription and designation, and the commercial reach is stated in both. TO RE-DERIVE WITHOUT REDOING THE RESEARCH: fetch that PDF, run pdftotext -layout over it, and grep for 252.246-7003 — 3 occurrences on 2026-08-11, poppler pdftotext. (verified 2026-08-11)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.