Clauses · FAR · Supply chain and sourcing
FAR 52.211-15 Defense Priority and Allocation Requirements
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
Yes
The clause itself has no flow-down paragraph; the obligation to extend the rating to subs comes from the DPAS regulation (15 CFR 700) that the clause incorporates — the rating flows down the entire supply chain of the rated item
- Form
- substance — not by inserting the FAR clause, but by force of 15 CFR 700 itself: whoever receives a rated order must place rated orders with suppliers of the needed items
- Reaches
- all tiers
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-04 · edition APR 2008 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
2 items for your checklist, slowest first.
A program you have to be running
You are either running it or you are not, and what the prime asks for is the date it started.
Scheduling that puts the rated order ahead of unrated work, and rated orders of your own placed on the suppliers of what it needs
FAR 52.211-15
Something you fill in and send back
Hours, once you know which one is missing.
A written acceptance or rejection of the rated order, back to the customer inside the window the priorities regulation sets and on the grounds it allows
FAR 52.211-15
When it is used
Applies when the prime's contract is a DPAS rated order (DO- or DX-), certified for national defense/emergency preparedness/energy program (prescribed at 11.604(b)); no threshold. The clause text is a single sentence: comply with 15 CFR 700.
Read closely
the clause is a single sentence with no lettered paragraphs, so the citation is to the clause itself. The deadlines, the grounds on which an order may be rejected, the duty to prioritize it over unrated work — including delaying a commercial customer — and the duty to extend the rating to your own suppliers all sit in the Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation at 15 CFR 700, which the clause adopts whole.
The 14 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, FAR 52.211-15 and 11.604(b); 15 CFR 700 (verified 2026-08-04)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.