Clauses · FAR · Pricing and audit
FAR 52.243-6 Change Order Accounting
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
No
The prime includes it so the sub's segregated accounting feeds the prime's equitable adjustment before the CO — a prime's REA without segregated sub numbers doesn't stand up
A clause can reach your subcontract without a mandate. Once it is in your document, it is a contract term all the same. The missing mandate is a fact about the regulation. It is not a ruling on your order.
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-04 · edition APR 1984 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
One item for your checklist.
A program you have to be running
You are either running it or you are not, and what the prime asks for is the date it started.
- FAR 52.243-6
Separate accounts by job order for each change or series of related changes, holding all segregable direct cost less credits, for both the changed work and the unchanged work the change affected
Owed where the buyer requires it and the estimated cost of the change or series of related changes exceeds $100,000
When it is used
Optional clause: 43.205(f) says the CO 'may insert'. When present, it activates whenever the estimated cost of a change — or a series of related changes — exceeds $100,000. No regulatory flow-down; it comes down when the prime wants the sub's change costs segregated to support its own claim.
Read closely
The clause is a single undesignated paragraph, so there is no paragraph letter to give. The records stay until the equitable adjustment is agreed or the dispute is finally resolved, and a spreadsheet rebuilt months later is not what the paragraph describes.
The 9 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, FAR 52.243-6 and 43.205(f) (verified 2026-08-04)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.