Clauses · DFARS · Environment and safety
DFARS 252.223-7003 Change in Place of Performance—Ammunition and Explosives
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
No
No flow-down paragraph in the text. Primes include it in energetics subcontracts because the government's safety review is done per address — (c) only binds the contractor, and the prime needs to bind the sub the same way to keep control of the approved site.
A clause can reach your subcontract without a mandate. Once it is in your document, it is a contract term all the same. The missing mandate is a fact about the regulation. It is not a ruling on your order.
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-11 · edition DEC 1991 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
One item for your checklist.
Something you fill in and send back
Hours, once you know which one is missing.
The place of performance for all ammunition and explosives work, written into the Place of Performance provision at offer
DFARS 252.223-7003(a)
When it is used
Accompanies Safety Precautions for Ammunition and Explosives (prescription 223.370-5): it goes into the same ammunition/explosives contracts. It locks the location: the offeror identifies where the energetics work will be done ((a)) and nobody changes that address — in the proposal ((b)) or during performance ((c)) — without the Contracting Officer's prior written approval. It has no flow-down requirement.
Read closely
Leaving it out can get the offer rejected under (a). After that the address is fixed: (b) blocks a change after offers are due and (c) blocks one during performance, in both cases without the contracting officer's advance written approval, which turns on there being time for a new safety review at the new site.
The 11 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, DFARS 252.223-7003. CODIFIED REGIME, read 2026-08-11 on the part-252 page at DFARS Change 5/7/2026: "As prescribed in 223.370-5, use the following clause:" with designation (DEC 1991). RFO CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0018 (DFARS part 223, effective February 1, 2026) CARRIES THIS CLAUSE AT THE SAME NUMBER: the memo prescribes it at 223.370-5 and prints it (DEC 1991). So the two regimes AGREE here on number, prescription and designation, and an agreement read is recorded because the alternative is silence that a reader cannot tell from an unread deviation. TO RE-DERIVE THE DEVIATION HALF WITHOUT REDOING THE RESEARCH: fetch acquisition.gov/sites/default/files/page_file_uploads/DoD_RFO_Deviation_Part-23.pdf (593744 bytes, 22 pages, DARS Tracking Number 2026-O0018, "Effective February 1, 2026, contracting officers shall use"), run pdftotext -layout over it, and grep for 252.223-7003 — 2 occurrences on 2026-08-11, poppler pdftotext. Both regimes read against their primary sources on 2026-08-11, and the deviation half re-read a second time and the recipe above measured on 2026-08-11 (verified 2026-08-11)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.