Clauses · DFARS · Environment and safety
DFARS 252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
Yes
(d): 'include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (d), in all subcontracts, including subcontracts for commercial products or commercial services, that are for supplies, maintenance and repair services, or construction materials'. No dollar threshold.
- Form
- substance
- Reaches
- all tiers (self-replicating — (d) requires flowing it down including (d) itself)
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-11 · edition JAN 2023 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
One item for your checklist.
Something you write
Days to weeks, and nobody outside your company has to agree to it.
- DFARS 252.223-7008(c)
A written request to the contracting officer for authorization to incorporate hexavalent chromium
Owed when a deliverable or construction material has to carry hexavalent chromium — and before it is made, since (b) otherwise bars delivering it
When it is used
Goes in, per the 223.7306 prescription, in contracts for supplies, maintenance and repair services, or construction materials. It prohibits a deliverable or construction material that (i) contains hexavalent chromium above 0.1% by weight in any homogeneous material, or (ii) requires removing/reapplying hexavalent chromium material during sustainment phases. Exception: Cr(VI) generated as a manufacturing process by-product. Intentional use only with authorization requested from the Contracting Officer. Flows down into all subcontracts for the same subject matter — including commercial ones.
Read closely
(b)(1) bars a deliverable whose homogeneous material carries more than 0.1 percent hexavalent chromium by weight, and bars one that needs chromate removed and reapplied later in service; (b)(2) leaves out hexavalent chromium produced as a by-product of a manufacturing process. The measurement is per homogeneous material as (a) defines it — what cannot be mechanically disjointed, so an individual plating, paint or alloy — and that definition expressly does NOT include conversion coatings that chemically modify the substrate. Chromated primers and hard chrome are where this usually lands.
The 18 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, DFARS 252.223-7008. CODIFIED REGIME, read 2026-08-11 on the part-252 page at DFARS Change 5/7/2026: "As prescribed in 223.7306, use the following clause:" with designation (JAN 2023). RFO CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0018 (DFARS part 223, effective February 1, 2026) CARRIES THIS CLAUSE AT THE SAME NUMBER: the memo prescribes it at 223.7306 and prints it (JAN 2023). So the two regimes AGREE here on number, prescription and designation, and an agreement read is recorded because the alternative is silence that a reader cannot tell from an unread deviation. TO RE-DERIVE THE DEVIATION HALF WITHOUT REDOING THE RESEARCH: fetch acquisition.gov/sites/default/files/page_file_uploads/DoD_RFO_Deviation_Part-23.pdf (593744 bytes, 22 pages, DARS Tracking Number 2026-O0018, "Effective February 1, 2026, contracting officers shall use"), run pdftotext -layout over it, and grep for 252.223-7008 — 2 occurrences on 2026-08-11, poppler pdftotext. Both regimes read against their primary sources on 2026-08-11, and the deviation half re-read a second time and the recipe above measured on 2026-08-11 (verified 2026-08-11)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.