Clauses · DFARS · Banned sources and products
DFARS 252.225-7007 Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Items from Communist Chinese Military Companies
Does the regulation require it to flow down?
Yes
(c): 'in all subcontracts for items covered by the United States Munitions List or the 600 series' — no dollar threshold and no commercial exception
- Form
- substance, including paragraph (c) itself
- Reaches
- all tiers
Checked against acquisition.gov on 2026-08-04 · edition DEC 2018 · base v0.9.3 Read the text ↗
What it makes you produce
One item for your checklist.
Nothing to send, ever
There is no paperwork here. It is a rule you follow while you perform the work.
Keeping items on the United States Munitions List and the 600 series of the Commerce Control List clear of any Communist Chinese military company in the chain, directly or indirectly
DFARS 252.225-7007(b)
When it is used
Goes into any contract — including commercial FAR Part 12 — involving delivery of items on the United States Munitions List or the 600 series of the Commerce Control List, except the 225.770-3 exceptions (US vessel/aircraft visit to China, testing, intelligence collection). No dollar threshold. Flows down into every subcontract for those items.
Read closely
The clause runs definitions, prohibition and flow-down, and asks for no report, no certificate and no notice; paragraph (c) carries the substance, including itself, into all subcontracts for items covered by that list or that series, with no dollar floor and no commercial exception. Origin diligence on any Chinese link in the controlled item's chain is what the prohibition rests on. Where nothing you deliver is on the list or in the series, there is no covered item for it to reach.
The 16 templates that name it, with the line
Source: acquisition.gov, DFARS 252.225-7007, 225.1103(4), 225.770-3 and 212.301(f) (verified 2026-08-04)
This is research, not legal advice. It states what the regulation says about this clause and cites the paragraph behind it. It does not rule on your order, and it does not rule on whether a prime's markings are correct.